User talk:kallerna

Archive:

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.

File:SSG Food Market 3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:SSG Food Market 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yeongdong-daero 2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Yeongdong-daero 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yeongdong-daero 4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Yeongdong-daero 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De-admin discussion opened edit

Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As there was consensus on COM:ANU to open this: Commons:Administrators/Requests/Kallerna (de-adminship 2). --A.Savin 01:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's really odd... edit

Latest comment: 1 day ago4 comments4 people in discussion

...that you are trying to reinstate an offensive comment by indefblocked LTA Livioandronico2013. It's clear that you are targeting me with that, and to be honest, seldom in my Wikimedia activity I had seen such childish behaviour by an admin. Regards --A.Savin 00:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is forbidden to remove comments from talk pages, especially if they are related to the user removing the comment. I do not know who is behind the comment. This accusation of me targeting you is quite severe, and I would like you to take it back. —kallerna (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not odd
Nothing odd, in my view, per COM:AGF. But the comment above is rude, "seldom in my Wikimedia activity I had seen such childish behaviour by an admin". Why coming here to infringe COM:CIVIL, at a moment where it is an issue? See "Direct rudeness: belittling a fellow editor". -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very rude....would be him from deadmin. Savin has always been aggressive. 151.47.166.251 17:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 3 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterworks Onkalo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 2 days ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malmö Kronprinsen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --IM3847 14:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 14:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kozjak 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Amazing picture! --Plozessor 05:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skopje Millennium Cross 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 1 day ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Popova Šapka 2024 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Draceane 08:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic