User talk:Denelson83

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright
File:Canadian Alerting Attention Signal.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— Preceding unsigned comment added by B4531826 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.

EugeneZelenko 14:59, 16 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please put similar files to Category:English pronunciation. --EugeneZelenko 16:26, 24 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

orphan images are useles[edit]

Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries) or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.

For your musical symbols, you may for instance use Category:Musical notation

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb(?!) 23:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Duplicate flags[edit]

Just to let you know, your SVGs in Category:International Code of Signals more or less duplicate the work of others in Category:Nautical_Signal_Flags. Deco 03:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of Turkey[edit]

At Image:Flag of Turkey.svg, you wrote that "User believes that the flag of Turkey does not include a white strip at the hoist." Do you have a source justifying this belief? If so, please indicate it at Image talk:Flag of Turkey.svg. Note that the Turkish flag law and Flags of the World both indicate the white heading. User:dbenbenn 23:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pabellón.[edit]

Hi, Denelson. As you requested me:

but I need help with Bandera de Guerra del Perú 300.png because of the flags on the sides. Red color for the flag is R:206 G:17 B:38, not brillant red as someones do. Napaykuna. Guillermo Romero <SUP><NOWIKI>[</NOWIKI>[[User talk:Guillermo Romero|@]]<NOWIKI>]</NOWIKI></SUP>[[MANAN|<nowiki></nowiki>]] 21:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Naval flags of israel[edit]

Hi Denelson,

The Magen David in the naval flags of Israel should have the same blue as the field. see [1]

Grüße --Kookaburra 09:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
What is your source for the correct colours of the DRC flag? ---moyogo 14:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I used the image from the World Flag Database. Denelson83 22:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, I have reasons to believe these colours are not "correct". Even if both sets of colours, with dark blue or with sky blue, are being used by congolese media, it seems the correct colours are with the sky blue. First of all flags.net has wrong data about the languages spoken in the Congo, which makes me wonder about the quality of their data overall. Secondly the official website of the President of the DRC (http://www.presidentrdc.cd/) has the sky blue flag. The the CIA World Factbook also has a sky blue flag: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/flags/cg-flag.html But seeing both sets of flags all over the place, with the fact that the Constitution doesn't really define if it light or dark blue, I'd say both sets are ok, with a preference for the light blue one for the reasons given above. http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/cd.html also uses dark blue, so it's a bit confusing. ---moyogo 12:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Update[edit]

I've come across this picture : http://permanent.nouvelobs.com/photos/20060219.OBS3917.jpg on http://permanent.nouvelobs.com/etranger/20060219.OBS7247.html It shows the old flag up with soldiers holding the new flags at the promulgation of the new constitution yesterday. Both new and 1997 flags have light blue (the article mentions both had sky blue back colour). What should we do? Currently both our new and 1997 flags bear dark blue. ---moyogo 15:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC) Here’s another picture: http://www.mmcnews.com/news_images/constitution-drapeau.jpg from http://www.digitalcongo.net/fullstory.php?id=64742 . It looks like Image:Flag of Congo Kinshasa 1966.svg with light blue. ---moyogo 16:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC) + in English: [2] [3] with photos. ---moyogo 16:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC) +Photos of the old flag on registered voters cards: [4] [5]Reply[reply]

This should be fixed now, since I ditched extra SVG code and wrote this out by hand. If not, I do not know what I can say man. Zach (Smack Back) 14:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You changed the dimensions of the flag to 7:5, probably using the World Flag Database as a source. I'm pretty sure of thta the deminsions used in earlier versions 25:18 is correct. My sources for that is Flags of the World and my interpretation of the Iclenadic law Lög um þjóðfána Íslendinga (first paragraph). Now I'm not Icelandic and could have misunderstod the text. Just thought it would be best to tell you why I reverted your edit since it doens't say anything in the revert summary. Jeltz 15:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reverted your changes to the flag of Uruguay because borders aren't part of the flag design and therefore shouldn't be in the image itself, the sun isn't supposed to have gradients and there was no explanation given about the changing of the colours. –Vzb83 10:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Horse should be looking straight to the left. Guillermo Romero [@] 17:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I mean horse should not turn the head anymore, I've just read the law. See that: [6] Guillermo Romero [@] 21:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, can you please explain me why did you revert this image. That image is NOT flag of Serbia, that is flag of serbian people. You can see official site for explanation here. Next time please first make a check before revert something :) --Sasa Stefanovic (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I uploaded a new version, with (more or less) correct colors (see en:Flag of Serbia). I "reverse-engineered" the Pantone colors from the official CorelDraw version from the site above. Even if they're wrong, they're only slightly wrong – they were very wrong in the older version. Duja 08:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What about licensing of this file? Is it really "inelligible for copyright"? Once again, I find wikilicensing confusing. Duja 08:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, but what about the version with coat of arms? I confess I took the original from the Parliament of Serbia web page and only converted it to svg. 147.91.173.31 07:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I already answered that question. Denelson83 07:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Palmyra Atoll, Navassa Island, Johnston Atoll[edit]

Thanks for the SVG flags of Wake Island and Midway Islands! They are nice! I think it might be a good idea down the line to do the flags of Johnston Atoll, Navassa Island, & Palmyra Atoll so that are set will be complete.) These areas (plus the two mentitioned above have flags; the other four islands do not have flags). Here are some starters:

Thanks!

- Hoshie 04:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You seem very knowledgeable and talented. Can you point me in the direction of sources with the history of the Johnston Atoll Flag and the flags (former) usage on the Island? A message on the Johnston atoll talk page would be great. Thanks.Johnvr4 (talk) 14:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a message on Commons talk:Pantone color chart about the copyright status of the Adobe colours. Greentubing (en:WP talk) 01:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the help, I think it was a problem of cache. --E2m 05:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I yust add {{Ifc}} to the your flag Ceuta Flag.svg. See the different size of COA on http://www.terra.es/personal/vexileon/sev/beceu.htm. Bye --PavelD 15:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great job. Please fix the color of pearls on the crown too. Or I will do it later by myself. But I don't have any svg editor and I do it in vim ;-) (only for color reduction it's enough) thx --PavelD 23:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I made some changes in Ceuta flag according to official description. Look on pls, it is my first bigger svg graphic. Thx --PavelD 16:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read http://flagspot.net/flags/hn.html. The version with the stars more spread out is defined by an official decree. –Vzb83 10:40, 19 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This image is not correct. First off it uses a harp similar to the one used on the , with the orentation of the harp having the strings perpindicular to the length. Also the colour of the string in the harp are silver, not gold. See: Naval Service Flags & Ensigns -- | 07:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

SVG Lion[edit]

Fyi the lion on Image:Flag of New South Wales.svg is not PD, contrary to the tag that was there. I forgot to add attribution after uploading and it is actually a GFDL lion by w:en:User:Lupin (tarball linked from here). If my licence knowledge is correct derivatives need to be GFDL too, making Image:Government Ensign of Jersey.svg also GFDL. Let me know what you think about this, and if you got the lion as a PD-thing elsewhere, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Greentubing (en:WP talk) 09:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flags of Venezuela[edit]

I'd lik to traduce to you the law of the flag for your better understanding the them:

LEY DE BANDERA, ESCUDO E HIMNOS NACIONALES (source:http://www.leyesvenezolanas.com/lbehn.htm)
FLAG, SHIELD AND NATIONAL ATHEMS LAW
Chapter II
about the National Flag

Article 2. The National Flag is that the Republic Congress adopted in 1811, formed by the colours yellow, blue, and red; in united, equal, horizontal bands; in the order that stays expressed, up to down.

The Natonal Flag used by Presidency of the Republic and the National Armed Forces, as wich one hoisted in National, State and Municipal Public Buildings most show the Coat of Arms of Venezuela in the corner next to the spear of the yellow band, and, in the middle of the blue band, seven five-branches white stars shown in an circle arc with convexity to up side. National Flag uesd by teh Merchant Navy just shows the seven stars

Article 3. National Executive branch has the authority to rule the shape and dimensions of standards, emblems, and insignia that will use National Flag colours, as any other use of them in condecorations and emblems.

Article 4. National Armed Forces flags, standards, emblems and emblems shape, use and dimensions will be ruled by the militar laws and codes.

Article 5. National Flag should be hoist in: (...)

  1. From article 1, we most know: the flag used in 1811. Before that date, Francisco the Miranda has been proposed rename America (continet) as Colombia in honour of Chritopher Colombus. That idea was accepted in northern South America. Mach 12, 1806 Francisco de Miranda claims the independence of the countre, hoisting a triband flag as shown in this page, after known as "Bandera Madre" ("Mother Flag"). Is that flag that was proclamed in 1811 an that colours where accpted also for the following Repúbica de Colombia (Great Colombia). then:
    1. When current Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador split from Great Colobia, they kept the ssame colours for their flags. Thinctures used in Hispanic America were the same across the region, so same "red" (strictly "encarnado") used in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela flag is the same used in Perú, Bolivia, Paraguay, Chile and Spain flags; same for yellow and blue.
  1. Form same article we also advice that stars are not used in all the versiona, it has also it's historic reasons: Stars are not used until 1817, where it's given a law to use seven blue stars in the yellow band when used by Navy. That's the origin of the stars.

I wish now you could be accord to the design that I uploaded. By the way, you posted the cibil flag I uploaded for beeing deleted, but it's naming was right for the proyect of flags. Also by the way, Pablellón Nacioanl del Peru.svg is no longer used in any Wikimedia proyect, so it should be good for deleeting it. See you. Guillermo Romero [@] 15:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC) (please:Look also the foto of the National Assembly Capitol, where has right colors. Vexilla-mundi alo does.Reply[reply]

May I think it's about naming?[edit]

Folowing the proyect, It sholuld be "Flag/Ensign of XXX (usage).svg Even, Flag of XXX.svg should be civil flag, so jus should be these names:

Please, answer me as soon as possible. Guillermo Romero [@] 16:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wait there, please. In the proyect there says nothing like that. I most suppose the only difference among our ideas now is that. Bye. Guillermo Romero [@] 18:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey, that was unfair. That should be spoken. Please, think back. Guillermo Romero [@] 18:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Denelson, why are you in IRC if you're not going to pay attention??? :) Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 22:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Honduras[edit]

Those are different things. I'm not against you, I just defend my position with all documents as possible. I'll try to make Honduras CoA, but as you have seen it's pretty complicated, so I'll find out more about and I'm uploading it possibly in Monday (if I could). Bye. Guillermo Romero [@] 07:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, that work is harder that I thought. I can't do it right now as I wish because I'm right now very busy with getting prepared to my admision test to college, but I'm allways looking after it and trying to get mor info. See you very soon. Guillermo Romero [@] 02:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for understanding. Guillermo Romero [@] 03:19, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

flag borders[edit]

Sorry, I will do it. Thank you for the advice.

--Jynus 04:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Swiss cantons[edit]

Thank you for doing great job on drawing flag images!

I found Image:Switzerland canton flag UW.png which doesn't have SVG version yet.

Do you plan to work on COAs images? They are looking similar to flags.

EugeneZelenko 16:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Denelson83, the pattern of blue on the Azorean flag seems to be wrong; the shade is darker, just as you can find here. Thanks --Brian Boru 18:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Flag of Austria (state).svg[edit]

hi Denelson, thank you for drawing the flag. Do you think you could also add the PD-self template, in order to release it as your own work? Or something similar amongst those lines? thank you.. Gryffindor 00:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request[edit]

hi Denelson, thanks for your excellent work. I have a request to make: Do you think you could also convert this image Image:Dienstflagge Austria.png into an svg. but making it look exactly like the png. version (same colour, same proportions, etc.) It is also the state flag, however there are different versions of the state flag. One that you created (Image:Flag of Austria (state).svg) is used on embassies for example, and the one I am requesting is used more specifically by the government (on cars for example) and the military. You can see the difference because the proportions are totally different. Feel free to ask if you have any questions, I'm really looking forward to it, thanks. Gryffindor 23:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That was quick, wow. But the size is still different, the original png. is shorter on its length. The svg. is also smaller than the png. The colours are also different, or is that not possible with svg.? I don't wanna sound complicated, but I really wanted an exact 1:1 of the png. to the svg..... :-/ Gryffindor 00:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should we use this jack image on all articles related to the US Navy? I want to be sure before I run my automated bot to replace all PNG images with this or the 50 Star Jack (pre-9/11).User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Austrian flags[edit]

You recently changed Image:Flag of Oberösterreich.svg and Image:Flag of Kärnten.svg. They don't appear anymore, neither on commons nor in the German Wikipedia (). Could you upload them again or have a look what occured? Thanks, --Griensteidl 19:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of Macau[edit]

Hi, would you be able to fix Image:Flag of Macau.svg please? The current flag on Commons is apparently an old version; the bar directly below the flowers should be curved/smooth (as shown on the government website), contrary to the current straight one. The Macau Wikipedians on Chinese Wikipedia have pointed this out, but seem unsure of who to ask for help. Could you help? Thanks! -- tonync (talk) 11:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fantastic. Thank you very much. -- tonync (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, sorry, the Macau Wikipedians think the current edition still needs working on. They point out a problem with the size of the stars and the linear patterns in the bottom. Would this link help? Thank you for your patience and generous help! -- tonync (talk) 03:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't think there's a proper construction sheet to the flag. I think the flag only needs one final touching up anyway -- the size of the stars are good now; a Macau Wikipedian points out that in the bottom half of the symbol, the thickness of the green lines increases as the white decreases. -- tonync (talk) 13:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Looks like the Macau Wikipedians have stopped complaining, haha. Thank you for doing such a great job! :) -- tonync (talk) 05:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the African Union.svg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Sanbec 11:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You put "Copyvio allegation denied", but you don't explain why. webchantier.com has copyright, you must justify why the flag is in the PD. Sanbec 07:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi I'am currently redesigning the deletion template scheme towards more simplicity, thus I reverted your change. I know that images with copyvio tagged are currently not listed as deletion request but they are in fact deletion requests. A user has 7 days correcting the thing otherwise the file will be deleted. The Template:Copyvio (and other similar) will be discouraged in future. All people should use Template:Delete then. It is important to have one template to rule them all as currently our users are confused by the large number of deletion templates. I will also rewrite the deletion guidelines after the change in order to reflect this new approach but one step after the other ;-) Arnomane 11:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag borders[edit]

The {{Border}} template hack messes up the vertical alignment of the image. ed g2stalk 11:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, it doesn't. Denelson83 21:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Err, it does... compare and . ed g2stalk 23:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is aesthetically unpleasing on a page such as w:2006 FIFA World Cup to have one flag out of line in a list of countries. ed g2stalk 10:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm afraid I'll have to agree, yes. —Nightstallion (?) 17:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Err, what would be a policy violation? It's a free image with a valid use... ed g2stalk 02:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of CARICOM[edit]

Hello, Denelson83. You have many good flags here, which obviously represent lots of effort. However, I noticed that your CARICOM flag was different from the one that I have seen on CARICOM's own website. Your reference was http://www.flags.net/CARI.htm but perhaps we should use the flag/standard seen at CARICOM's own website: http://www.caricom.org/jsp/community/caricom_standard.jsp?menu=community . As it stands, the English Wikipedia article on CARICOM has a clean PNG version of this flag, so perhaps you could convert it from PNG to SVG? 72.27.63.93 00:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Civil ensign of Bangladesh - 3:5 or 1:2?[edit]

I notice you changed the ratio of Image:Civil Ensign of Bangladesh.svg from 1:2 to 3:5. Is that correct? The sources I've seen on the web all show it being 1:2. Thanks for all your work on making these flags available! --ScottMainwaring 23:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Emblem request[edit]

Hi Denelson, you've done amazing work with the flags!! I have a request: We've been looking for an SVG version of the Indian emblem to use for our graphics. We've been plagued by low res images as reference for a long time now. As a workaround, I've clicked a hi-res image of the emblem as a reference (Image:HPIM1671.JPG). Please could you draw the emblem? Thanks and regards, Nichalp 13:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've seen that image, but it does not seem to be completely correct. Notice the base of the emblem. Nichalp 14:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The pedestal is incorrect. Miljoshi, had informed be that his image was the best he could draw with a low res reference. Regards, Nichalp 03:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Any luck on the Emblem? Regards, Nichalp 16:05, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Argentine flag deletion request / superseded image[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Argentina (civil).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

ALE! 10:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of Mexico Image File[edit]

Please read the disscusion of "Flag of Mexico.svg". You are reverting the version of the flag to a wrong one, displaying a totally wrong Coat of Arms. AlexCovarrubias 00:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you modify it to make it similar to this flag? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question Mark colors[edit]

Denelson83, may you also make a red version of the image: Image:Circle-question.png, replace it with the red version... Then the green version will be named .

Keyboard layouts[edit]

There's a slight problem involving the keyboard layout images you've produced, such as Image:KB United States.svg. In Firefox, most of the keys are rendered with a white background. In IE, they have a gray background. MediaWiki converts to pngs, and those must surely be the same for IE and Firefox, so I assume those browsers are rendering them differently. Image:KB United States Dvorak.svg (which I created from Image:KB United States.svg) doesn't suffer from this — it always has a white background. However, I'm not sure what was intended. --StuartBrady 13:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(I'm get the impression you might prefer to discuss this on my talk page instead of yours... if that's the case, I think it'd be best if I moved the whole section there.)
Ahh. I had a guess that transparency was probably the cause. I'm not sure how best to fix this. IE is a pain. Would it be alright if I left it to you to sort this out? (Oh, I forgot, there's Image:KB Blickensderfer.svg, too.) I'm planning to do a whole lot more of these, and I was using Inkscape, so if you know what I did wrong, I'd be very grateful. Cheers. --StuartBrady 23:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

White Flag[edit]

Hi Denelson,
if found the Image:White flag of surrender.svg made by Jeremy Nimmo, but as he is not online that often I ask you...
He used a 2:3 ratio for the flag. I would prefer a 3:5 ratio as it's common for most national flags and also used for the Red Cross/Cresent/Crystal/Lion/Star flags. If you agree, please upload a 3:5-version. I think the image can uploaded under the same name... Just a simple job, I know. But I can do it... Thanks. -- burts 15:13, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Washington.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Geopgeop 19:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, I just saw your name in the file upload history. Sorry, I just thought you would like to know. --Geopgeop 06:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Denelson83! I just noticed this image and your call for deletion. The cause why the image isn't displayed is that your "implemented" PNG image is just a link to a file on your hard disc which is truly pretty difficult to reach for the Wikimedia renderer ;) ("C:\Documents and Settings\D****n\Local Settings\Temp\YUV.png"). You should really implement the image, but I don't know how to realize this with Inkscape. --Madden 18:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Georgia flag (US State, 2001-2003)[edit]

I got the construction sheet of the flag image from the Georgia Sec. of State. Can I email this to you somehow? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RE: Flag of Canada[edit]

Greetings! Thanks for your note; no problem. Not to necessarily question the authority of the Cdn Heritage grid (which I'm familiar with), though, but you might want to take a glance at the true prototype for the Canadian flag: as depicted in the original proclamation (in I Stand for Canada by Archbold) -- the maple leaf is described as being 'of the first' and appears sligthly different than depicted and popularised. In support of my decision to centre the leaf, I believe one of the originators of the original Wp SVG file (whom you directed me to) created . My point: the uncentred maple leaf appears slightly off and I'm unsure that it's precise placement (i.e., as reverted) is prescribed.

On a similar note, I intend on enhancing some of the Canadian provincial/territorial flags: I believe some of the SVG files are not true representations of those flags (e.g., Alberta). Otherwise, good work and let me know if you have any questions.Cogito ergo sumo 05:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Polish flag[edit]

Hi, I recently uploaded several images of Polish flags which differ from the ones uploaded by you. I believe mine are better in terms of legal requirements found in Polish law (especially different shades of white and red). The problem is that they are in PNG format and I have no software to convert them to SVG. Would you be able to do this, please? See: Talk:Polska#Request for PNG to SVG conversion. Kpalion 15:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of Mexico[edit]

Hello Denelson. I was wondering if you could help me make a bigger version of the current file "Flag of Mexico.svg" based in "Flag of Mexico.png". Since I cannot create SVG files I made a bigger version of the PNG file. I hope you can help me. AlexCovarrubias 01:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How big do you want it? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of Ukraine[edit]

I believe that the original Flag of Ukraine represents the national flag better. I'm Ukrainian myself, if that counts. Let's discuss it before switching back and forth between those two flags. Akhristov 06:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you don't believe me, look at this flag in the background: http://www.president.gov.ua/done_img/b/4/4375.jpg. Akhristov 00:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PCP-SL[edit]

¡Qué despista'o que soy! :P Muchas gracias por avisarme. --Huhsunqu [@] 18:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"The author of xrmap"[edit]

Hi Denelson83! You have uploaded a great number of SVG flags, created by the "author of xrmap" -- do you happen to know his/her actual name, so that we can use a proper {{PD-author}} tag instead of the deprecated {{PD}}. Cheers, Himasaram 02:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Image:Flag of Liechtenstein.svg for my attempt to 'fix' the licensing tag: Many admins don't accept the {{PD}} tag as proper licensing. --Himasaram 02:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Flag of the CIS.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Cat out 12:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Cat out 12:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of La Francophonie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Cat out 12:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Svalbard flag[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Svalbard Flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Inge 16:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flags of Bouvet Island[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Bouvet Island (local).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Inge 16:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have also requested the deletion of Image:Flag of Bouvet Island (rectangular).svg for the same reason. Having these flags on commons has resulted in a number of wikipedias using the flags as if they were the official or semi-official flags of the island. Separate articles have even been created for them without any reference. Inge 16:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Kurdistan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Cat out 01:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag_of_the_African_Union.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Newfoundland and Labrador[edit]

Hi. Just as a heads up, I extracted the shield from your Image:Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador.svg to create Image:Coat of arms of Newfoundland and Labrador.svg in order to have a better replacement for en:Image:Nfld-arms.gif. If you make future improvements to the flag, you may wish to copy them over to the arms as well. Cheers—Ketil Trout (<><!) 23:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of the ICRC[edit]

Hi Denelson, about a year ago you created a large SVG of the flag of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) as seen here. In the meanwhile, the flag has been replaced by a modified version. It now has, upon request by the ICRC, the acronym "ICRC" in large letters written below the roundel. That's because the use of the roundel alone should be reserved for protective use during ICRC field missions while the combination of the roundel with the acronym (written in the font style and size relative to the roundel as shown in the modified version) is the preferred logo for indicative purposes like use within the Wikimedia projects. Could you please create a version of the image according to this specifications (roundel + acronym) in the same large size as your original image? The current version has a very low resolution, and a slightly different shade of Red than your version if I'm not mistaken. --Uwe 23:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your fast reaction! --Uwe 20:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Transparent compass card[edit]

Hi! Could you help me with Commons:Graphic Lab/Images to improve#Transparent compass card please? Maybe you still have the original files you used to make Image:Compass Card.png? --Para 20:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Compass Card 2.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. PatríciaR msg 19:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:KB US-International.svg[edit]

Hi, just a note to let you know I've uploaded a new version of Image:KB US-International.svg in which the shading on the backslash key has been removed. —Angr 20:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Civil maritime flags[edit]

Hello , What a Civil maritime flag can be used ? Army ? Ammar shaker 16:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

State flag of Poland[edit]

Sorry about that. What I plan to do is basically try to deduplicate and select the best versions of flags of Poland, which we have too many on Commons currently. If I understand correctly, deleting images will not be accepted as long as there is even a single link to it. Don't know if this policy applies to links on user pages. If I manage to clean up all the remaining links, would you oppose to having this image deleted? BTW, User:Rfl also claims on his page he has created the image (though the file history doesn't support that claim). --Wanted 12:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Naval Ensign of Ecuador.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Algeria.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

It is a bit unussual that a flag image should be copyright - for furhter information see the wikipedia article on the flag at w:Torres Strait Islander FlagGolden Wattle 00:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why this revertment of yours. Did you consult the talk page concerning this image. And why have you not syncronized those images which are contrary to Croatian law (all explained in the talk page) -- Rainman 22:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok. I'll try to do that. Thnx. -- Rainman 22:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. -- Rainman 00:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will synchronize the dependent images when the discussion about the Flag ends with some results. -- Rainman 02:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Just thought I'd give you a heads up that I nominated a bunch of royal flags at List of British flags for speedy deletion because you were named in some of the file descriptions. A lot of them came straight from http://flags.net/UNKG02.htm, and even the ones that have been converted to SVG are still copyright violations, because the design didn't really change. There were some where the Scottish corner wasn't the same, but I don't think it matters. I think most of them are tagged as public domain, and that's about as far away from the truth as it can get. I'm not sure where in the process you got involved, but I thought I'd give you a heads up. Ipankonin 09:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Royal Standard of England.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 06:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the Azores.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rockfang 05:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag_of_Belize.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 17:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images from the xrmap flag collection[edit]

Hi, could you please forward the e-mail where Jean-Pierre Demailly the copyright holder of the images in the xrmap flag collection agrees to release them to the public domain to permissions@wikimedia.org . Unless such a permission is recieved the images may be deleted. Thanks Lokal_Profil 17:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After much browsing I found the README.flags file. Would be usefull with a template for this here on Commons though. Anyhow this sorts out the xrmap problem for now but (see below) the http://www.webchantier.com/ problem remains. /Lokal_Profil 01:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag_of_the_Cayman_Islands.svg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 01:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This applies to all flags/COAs from http://www.webchantier.com/ ./Lokal_Profil 01:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your action to flag this image for deletion sets a very dangerous precedent. Do not take any further action without first discussing the issue at Commons talk:WikiProject Flags. -- Denelson83 01:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The only "precedent" being set is that images with a source also require a link (or e-mail) to somewhere where the copyrightholder has released the image under a free license, and this is not realy a precedent since it is a Commons requirement. So far I've seen no proof of http://www.webchantier.com/ having released their images to the Public Domain. Looking around on their homepage only presented the information "2005©Webchantier™". I repeat that unless such a permission can be presented the images may be deleted. /Lokal_Profil 22:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I nominated the image instead so please post any replies on Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Flag of the Cayman Islands.svg. /Lokal_Profil 01:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Flag_of_the_Cayman_Islands.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Lokal_Profil 01:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag request[edit]

Hi! I've got a request to make: Could you create a variation of Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg based on this suggestion to incorporate the Welsh dragon? Thanks a lot! —Nightstallion (?) 12:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag_of_Johnston_Atoll_(local).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

209.142.187.21 23:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Denelson83!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.182.126.61 12:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag_of_the_African_Union.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Lokal_Profil 14:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Flag of Tuvalu (state).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−
Please note that this request encompases all images from, or derived from, webchantier.com sources. /Lokal_Profil 11:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Civil Ensign of Luxembourg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--Caranorn (talk) 17:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I like this work.

But I am afraid, one of golden rings (around the shield) has to be silver, not golden. Or the referenced picture is not exact.

Regards Julo (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hello, Denelson83. You have new messages at Anonymous101's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Webchantier images[edit]

All of the images from Commons:Deletion requests/Images from webchantier.com have now been replaced. You've done some very impressive work on some of them. /Lokal_Profil 00:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. (deep sigh of relief) -- Denelson83 (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Blank_vowel_trapezoid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moxfyre (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorted. /Lokal_Profil 22:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

re H1N1 map[edit]

"Changing .fr back to .fx: Swine flu hasn't been reported in French Guiana or French Polynesia or New Caledonia or Saint-Pierre et Miquelon yet" Nor has it been reported in Alaska and Hawaii, yet other users insisted on including those. If we are going to include exclaves of one country that is marked on the map, we should include exclaves of all the countries marked on the map. Also, you are incorrect, as ".fr" does not include French Polynesia or New Caledonia or St Pierre et Miquelon. It only includes those areas which are part of France - which includes French Guiana, Reunion, Martinique, and Guadeloupe. So either put back .fr, or remove Alaska and Hawaii. We must be consistent. --Golbez (talk) 05:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed that you posted an edit summary "Do not edit this in Inkscape", and since I'm the one who edited it in Inkscape I should find out what difficulty it caused. To me it seems like my image and yours look the same, load the same way, and take up the same space. What is the standard way to edit such images for Wikipedia? Mike Serfas (talk) 01:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Awesome job on the zip codes map. I shared that on facebook because it was in such good detail.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Octagon-warning.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Octagon-warning.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

If it is your own work, could you please state that in the file description. Thanks. Cecil (talk) 11:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

map[edit]

Then change it.--Vrysxy (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vowel Recordings Criticism[edit]

I have some criticism of your vowel recordings. Most of them are diphthongs, if short ones, not true flat vowels. I could make recordings of the flat versions, but couldn't be counted as a native speaker for many of them, as English has a lot of vowels that are in-between IPA values or are short diphthongs. LokiClock (talk) 00:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About the Honduran Flag...[edit]

I dont understand why do we have to change another image just to change yhe image I already eant to change Well, Anyways The Honduran law in Spanish says exactly this in Spanish:

La Bandera Nacional de Honduras constará de tres franjas iguales y horizontales, la superior y la inferior de Color Azul Turquesa, la del centro blanca y llevará en medio cinco estrellas de cinco ángulos salientes del mismo color azul, formando con cuatro de ellas un cuadrilongo paralelo a las franjas, siendo colocada la restante al centro del mismo cuadrilátero.

Traduced to english:

The Nacional Honduran Flag would consist of three equal horizontal frames, the top and bottom one of Blue Turquoise Color and the center a white which which would have in the midlle five stars of five angles standing out with the same color blue, forming with four of them a cuadri-rectangle parallel to the frames, being one more colocated at the center of the same cuadrilateral.

I dont know about that other flag, since it looks loke it has nothing to be about the Honduran flag. If there really is something, please tell me at My Talk Page. I will revert your revertion,and if you really need to change that other image, then please do it yourself, because I currently have no Image editor. Thank You. --Ricardo P. (talk) 20:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Denelson83!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 11:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Lieutenant-Governor of New Brunswick.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--J Milburn (talk) 23:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your flag images...[edit]

I see from your userpage that the issue raised in the DR above is not a one off. Basically, drawing a flag does not mean that you suddenly own the copyright to it- it may well be in the public domain, but the mere fact that something is a flag does not suddenly make it PD. Basically, I'm asking you to check through your uploads, and verify the licensing- I'd imagine many of the images are public domain, but it's entirely possible that some are not. J Milburn (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keyboard layouts[edit]

Hi. I've seen some very interesting work from you on keyboard layouts using Inkscape. I'd like to have a shot at it myself, but am completely at a loss where to begin. Is there any way I could contact you so you could enlighten me a bit? It's just that I don't think a talk page is the best medium for that, but I simply couldn't find an alternative - is there any standard procedure to privately contact wikipedia users? Some kind of ad-hoc e-mail? Thank you. (António) 77.54.234.160 17:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of Prince Edward Island.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 21:14, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Prince Edward Island.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please[edit]

Hi Denelson can you please convert this historical flag of Kurdistan [7] into svg. I've tried many times to make it by my own without any good results, so I am asking for your help. Thanks for your work. Metino84 (talk) 05:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag_of_Sint_Eustatius.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag_of_Sint_Maarten.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 19:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag_of_the_ICRC.svg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag_of_the_ICRC.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Denelson83,

Thanks for making the adjustment (added the knot) to the coat of arms of the Italian Naval Ensign. Could you please now also make the same adjustment on the separate emblem (not on flag) which still has the knot missing !! Many thanks, Markab. --Markab1975 (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, my name is Andrés, from Argentina and I wonder if you could paint in yellow my country and Uruguay in this file: "Worldmap_digital_television_transition.svg‎", because they are in progress about digital TV, so shouldn't be green. I ask you because I don't know how. Regards and thanks a lot. Andrés.

[edit]

Dear sir, I was wondering if you could help me out with drawing a logo for me. I have this simple logo, but it is in a small format. I need it in a bigger size, but it has to be drawn. I have no idea how. Could you help me? Cheers ! Makedonia (talk) 00:45, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of Réunion[edit]

Hi,

I’m sorry but I launched a RfD about File:Flag of Réunion (Local).svg. Did you have any evidence that this flag is PD ? Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 13:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Denelson83,

would you be willing to license your excellent drawing of the Image:International amateur radio symbol.svg for private use by ham radio operators with a non-attribution license, so it could easily be used on e.g. s?

Thank you very much! 82.139.197.123 17:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Compass Card.png[edit]

There's a user at the help desk who started a topic asking how to legally use File:Compass Card.png in his thesis. Since as sole copyright holder, your interpretation of the license has weight, and you could easily make his life easier (or demand that every t be crossed and i dotted), I thought I'd leave a note for you.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Korean military flags[edit]

I'm wondering about the prominent "4.25" on File:Flag_of_the_Korean_People's_Army.svg (and File:Flag_of_the_Korean_People's_Navy.svg, which was based off of it). The earlier (JPEG) version didn't have it, and while I'm no expert, I have trouble believing that such numerals are actually part of a North Korean flag. Do we have a source that backs up Flags of the World in saying they belong there? (For the record, none of Commons' JPEG flags for the NK military, including the still-unvectorised air force flag, have the numerals; all of Flagspot's do. And they speculate that it means "April 25", which is plausible, but still speculation...) -- Perey (talk) 11:29, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag_of_South_Africa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jappalang (talk) 03:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your input requested[edit]

Commons_talk:Licensing#A_big_mess Kaldari (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Current_event_marker.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 22:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Personal_flag_of_Queen_Elizabeth_II.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TreasuryTag (talk) 20:29, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help[edit]

Hello! If you can convert these file (File:Флаг Российско-Американской торговой компании (1806 год).JPG) to SVG format. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 23:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Denelson

Thanks for publishing the picture of the flag here in commons. Unfortunally there is a "little" mistake in it, because the best thing of the bear inside the yellow part is missing. This is as far important as we are talking about it at a review site. If you are okay with it I will change it, otherwise pls write me a message on my discussion site at the german Wikipedia. Yours sincerley --Trinityfolium (talk) 13:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Music-sesquiflat.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

190.166.112.120 23:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the SPLAM.svg[edit]

Do you have any clue why the servers aren't rendering files uploaded lately? It's getting really annoying. Fry1989 (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag_of_ITU.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SV1XV (talk) 22:59, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag_of_ICAO.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SV1XV (talk) 23:03, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag_of_Sri_Lanka.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Share Bear (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Analog/Digital TV in Serbia[edit]

Please, see this info. Thanks. --WhiteWriter speaks 10:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag deletion discussion[edit]

Hi there. This is just to notify you that File:Austr.Aborig.png has been nominated for deletion. As you were involved in an earlier deletion discussion over the same design, I would appreciate your insight on the same concerns. The discussion is at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Austr.Aborig.png. Osiris (temp) (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flag of Somalia.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Somalia.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

McZusatz (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Right lane ends.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 17:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Keep right.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 00:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Organization of American States.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Psychonaut (talk) 16:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Finland (bordered).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Metrónomo (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Missouri.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

24.107.184.186 21:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Commonwealth of Nations.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 20:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Titi.mto (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ICS Papa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

190.123.178.224 14:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Canadian Army Flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

trackratte (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Canadian Forces Flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

trackratte (talk) 21:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Canadian Forces Flag.svg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Canadian Forces Flag.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

trackratte (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the United Nations.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DHeyward (talk) 08:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you worked on the Template:CSS IPA vowel chart
I've noticed that it looks ok here in Commons but in wiki the fonetic charackters get moved (linebreaks) I changed it on the dutch wikipedia nl:Sjabloon:Tabel IPA-klinkers where it works all right
you seem to use a template with a dot inside between the characters.
i use the " · " sequence and then the fonetic characters don't linebreak
perhaps you can take a look at it --DerekvG (talk) 13:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of ITU.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 17:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tharkun (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flag of Vermont.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Vermont.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

RP88 (talk) 06:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

australia flag[edit]

solle ali
red ensigns flag for Australia flag colours solle ali4 03:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Flag of Venezuela (state).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Photographer (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


de:Kärnten Boothy443 trácht ar en:Image:Flag of leinster.png en:QSL card a construction sheet image with the leaf centred

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Snake Flag of Martinique.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

— Racconish ☎ 06:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Korean People's Army[edit]

Hello! I'm wondering if the files for the flags of the Korean People's Army could be updated as follows:

All flags related to the Korean People's Army
Size: Set all flags to 2:3. https://imgur.com/dKpKoCy

Korean People's Army
Current flag: Set the flag of the Korean People's Army Ground Force as the flag for the entire Korean People's Army.
First flag: Create the first flag of the Korean People's Army based from this image: https://imgur.com/5tk8gUk || close-up on the emblem: https://imgur.com/17plumK
Reverse of the previous flags of the Korean People's Army: Same as the current reverse of the KPA flag but with the symbol of the Workers' Party of Korea being inside a yellow-outlined star.
Evolution of the flag for reference: https://imgur.com/v1MwDEC

Korean People's Army Strategic Force and Korean People's Army Special Operations Force
Strategic Force flag: the green-colored flag
Special Operations Force flag: the blue-colored flag on the right end. (Note: Stars in Big Dipper pattern under the 4.25 and on the emblem's wreath)
Reference: https://imgur.com/hBx7Sdi

Korean People's Army General Staff Department
https://imgur.com/RJsO70b

Worker-Peasant Red Guards
Replace slogan with "위대한김정은동지를수반으로하는 (top) 당중앙위원회를목숨으로사수하자! (bottom)" and remove the 4.25.

Looking forward to your reply. --Migs005 (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Canadian Alerting Attention Signal.ogg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Slim chance they made this, and cannot release it to public domain. They are not the owner. dozens of deleted media warnings on their profile,

CoolCanuck eh? 04:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I deeply apologize. After further inspection, it is obvious you did make this file. CoolCanuck eh? 04:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is it possible to make it seem more like the original? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1Sw5A99rho the tone starts on the higher frequency (not lower) and only plays approx 8 times. Thank you so much and sorry again. :) CoolCanuck eh? 04:44, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Cayman Islands.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 22:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Bolivia (state).svg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Bolivia (state).svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Any chance you could upload a version with the font in the CSS and the letters not converted to paths? It works really nicely as a template and being able to change the letters would make it much easier to make other keyboard layouts as derivative works of this file. You also didn't convert "Caps Lock" and "Shift", they show up as some serif font if I open the actual SVG, it doesn't matter though since the code generating SVG previews on Wikipedia has the font installed (and the font works well btw) Akeosnhaoe (talk) 06:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portbase (talk) 17:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Kurdistan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim (talk) 17:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flag of New York[edit]

Hi its my understanding that you are the creator of the NY state flag. I was wondering if you would be able to update it. The state senate just voted to add the words "e pluribus unum" underneath "Excelsior", a change that legally goes into effect on November 30th 2020 (https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/STL/70). The file that needs updating is the vector file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_New_York.svg

There is currently a png file on the "Coat of arms of New York" page that is what the new flag looks like: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coat_of_arms_of_New_York#/media/File:Flag_of_New_York_(Updated).png Thanks! Worldwidewebb77 (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Governor-General of Canada.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY 07:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Mississippi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Canada[edit]

You have attributed a few of your uploads to the MUTCDC. Do you have a copy of the document? I've been trying to obtain one for a while, but can't afford the sale price. Fry1989 eh? 19:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have a copy of the sign pattern manual. -- Denelson83 (talk) 20:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Would you be willing to share? Fry1989 eh? 20:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually, I am content with building up the full MUTCDC catalogue myself. I am using a combination of already-uploaded files and new files I upload myself.
If you would like to see my progress, just look here: Category:Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Canada - Regulatory road signs -- Denelson83 (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I hold absolutely no prejudice towards your filling the catalogue by yourself and would not attempt to step on your toes, but it would be nice to have a copy just for my own records keeping. But in any case, thank you for contributing in this shared interest. Fry1989 eh? 00:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi again. Can I ask what version of the FHWA typeface you are using? I have a knock-off version called Roadgeek, but it's not quite as good as the real thing. Fry1989 eh? 18:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am using the PIXymbols Highway Gothic fonts, as well as URW's SAA fonts. -- Denelson83 (talk) 06:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Flag of Poland (state).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aʀvєδuι + 08:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:British Columbia I-030-07.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:British Columbia I-030-07.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BC Information sign Update.[edit]

Hello Denelson, I'm going to update the §6.0 Information Signs for B.C. The MOTI updated it on the 22nd of April 2021. Update is available online under this web page: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-infrastructure/engineering-standards-guidelines/traffic-engineering-safety/traffic-signs-markings/updates Thank you! Allthecows (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Never mind, I cannot upload svg images. I will still be creating transparent pngs of the new images Allthecows (talk) 22:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Olympic flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

153.231.32.94 05:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BC signage[edit]

Greetings. You may have noticed that I have renamed most of the BC road signs that you uploaded (as well as my Quebec files, and soon Ontario), so that they will automatically sort together in categories. I hope that this has not annoyed you. However, there are still several that I have not yet renamed because they are a bit ambiguous. Would you be willing to assist me? For example, I have not renamed File:British Columbia PS-002-1.svg and File:British Columbia PS-002-2.svg yet because I lack information on the signalised crossing sign. I have 2 copies of the Pedestrian & School Signs index dated July 2020 and February 2022, neither of which show the second sign, but I know that there are GSV images of it in real life. Do you know if it ever had any official/experimental status, or is it unofficial? There are several other signs I would also like to discuss with you, if you do not mind. Fry1989 eh? 17:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I have noticed that the MUTCDC categories are also now incomplete.
There are several BC road signs on Commons that do not show up in the BC MoTI's sign pattern catalogue. They do have what are known by BC MoTI as "Z-records", and should be suggested to BC MoTI to be added to their regular sign pattern catalogue. -- Denelson83 (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In regards to the MUTCDC categories, I felt that it would be best not to jumble MUTCDC signs with examples from any of the provinces, even where they are relatively identical to a provincial sign, and especially considering that TAC has a new edition on the horizon. The unfortunate consequence is that, yes, for the moment the categories now appear incomplete. Would you not be inclined to upload the missing MUTCDC signs from your records?
There are two other things I did, which I hope you will appreciate. Firstly, I applied a uniform license, choosing {{PD-sign|type=road signs}} which you seemed to approve of. Secondly, in the case of signs with multiple versions, all versions are now included in the "other versions" section on the infobox for each file, for example File:CA-BC road sign P-020-1.svg.
On to British Columbia, there appears to have been many recent changes to the BC MoTI, and I also tried to reflect that in categorisation to the best of my abilities. Some signs appear to have beed redesigned (noticeably BC seems to be doing away with the dashed lines for signs applying only to trucks), or removed altogether. Knowing that there are also these Z-record signs that are missing from the standard catalogue helps somewhat. Would you describe these examples as something similar to the way DfT provides special warrants for non-standard signs? Or something that is being trialed for future addition to the standard catalogue? If I understand your comment correctly, it sounds a lot like the second. If that is true, perhaps I should wait on renaming these two signs until the signalised crossing version is officially added? Fry1989 eh? 00:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The Z-record signs are especially the result of special requests for sign patterns not in the standard catalogue. But if they could potentially be used anywhere in the province, then they should be added to the standard catalogue. What I would suggest is to rename the signs not in the standard catalogue to something more descriptive, and then put them into their own section on the Commons page titled something like "un-catalogued signs", and each one should have one set of coordinates pointing to where they actually are in use.
As for the MUTCDC categories, I really have the opposite standpoint. If there is a sign pattern on Wikimedia Commons that matches a pattern in the MUTCDC, it would really be a waste of effort to duplicate them just to be acknowledged as being in the MUTCDC. -- Denelson83 (talk) 00:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see. That certainly makes sense, and the Z-record signs can also always be renamed in the future if they are added to the standard catalogue at some point. The next issue would be signs that have been removed, for example File:British Columbia I-076-1.svg, with that same sign number now being occupied by a new design since at least the April 2022 update (I have copies of the information section dated for March and December 2020, April 2021, and April 2022). Ideally, I would like to rename historical signs under their original number and include the years of use in brackets, similar to File:Finland road sign 231 (1994–2020).svg. This would require assistance in determining the years of introduction and removal. For some signs, we may be able to find that out, but in the cases where that information can't be determined, it could be replaced with "obsolete" in brackets or something similar. Would you agree?
For the MUTCDC, since you disagree so firmly, I would not oppose returning the selected provincial signs. Fry1989 eh? 16:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That should work pretty well. It will give road signs a bit of a "usage history". -- Denelson83 (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's great. As you can see, I was able to find the years for File:CA-BC road sign RB-R-500-1 (2005–2021).svg and it's "siblings", although with many of the other signs I will require your assistance. I have also created Category:SVG semi-official road signs of British Columbia for those signs which I suspect are from the Z-records, whilst many others have been put in "historical" categories. However, there may be some overlap so please correct me wherever I am mistaken. Fry1989 eh? 15:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Flag of Queensland.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:4898:80E8:36:3B2E:EA6C:723A:C8ED.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Morocco.svg and associated files[edit]

Thank you for the beautiful job you've been doing on flags, including the Flag of Morocco. One detail I’ve noticed about that flag off-WP and in person: the star is "interwoven" or "interlaced", i.e. with breaks to suggest lines going over and under other lines, in what's called the "left-handed" version (the diagonal line from top to bottom crosses over the horizontal line on the left side). I've just posted both left-and-right-handed versions on Commons (left, right→), in case these help you when working on the flags. Happy wiki-ing! – Raven  .talk 13:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Foto Francia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Foto Franciaa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Palmyra Atoll (local).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mahāgaja · talk 19:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of the Pacific Community.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SVG-image-maker (talk) 12:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

#invoke:Autotranslate  Goldsztern  ✶  13:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]